Track Your Nutrition with AI
Snap a photo, track macros, and crush your goals instantly.
Snap a photo, track macros, and crush your goals instantly.
The scale is a terrible day-to-day signal and an excellent long-term one.
Yesterday's salty dinner, a hard leg session, a glass of water, the time of day - all of it moves the number by a kilo or more, and none of it is fat. Step on the scale, see plus 0.4, and conclude that a careful week did nothing. That conclusion is wrong, and it ends more diets than hunger does.
So the Weight page is built to answer the question the daily number cannot: is this working?
At the top is your current weight and how much it has changed since you started. Under it, if you have set a goal, is a journey bar: where you started, where you are, where you are heading, and how far along you are.
It is deliberately the first thing you see. On any given morning the number itself is noise. Progress along that bar is not.
When you set a goal you also choose a rate - how fast you intend to lose or gain each week. CalorTracker then measures the rate you are actually achieving and puts the two side by side with a verdict: ahead of plan, on track, a little slower than planned, or trending the wrong way.
The measured rate comes from a regression across up to eight weeks of weigh-ins, not from comparing your first weigh-in with your last. That distinction matters more than it sounds. If your first weigh-in happened to be a heavy day, first-versus-last can imply a rate that is off by half. A line fitted through every point you logged is much harder to fool.
From your measured pace, CalorTracker projects when you will actually arrive at your target - not when you would arrive if the plan went perfectly, but at the rate you are really going.
Some people find that motivating and some find it sobering. Both reactions are useful, and both beat finding out in four months.
This is the part that ties weight to everything else. Instead of applying a generic "minus 500 calories" to everybody, CalorTracker derives your daily calorie target from the weekly rate you picked, using roughly 7,700 kcal per kilogram of body mass.
Want to lose 0.25 kg a week? That is a far smaller daily deficit than 0.75 kg a week, and your target reflects it. The result is clamped for safety - the deficit is capped, and your goal will not drop below a sensible floor no matter what rate you ask for.
Your target then flows into the rest of the app. Meal plans, recipe suggestions, insights and the assistant all know your goal and your real pace, so their advice matches the plan you are actually on.
You are asked for a target weight if your goal is to lose or gain weight. You are not asked if your goal is muscle gain, maintenance or general health.
That is deliberate. During recomposition the scale can sit still for months while your body composition changes substantially. A target weight would report that as failure, which is both wrong and demoralising. Those users still get the full trend chart and history - they simply get no target, no projection and no reminders.
If you have a weight goal and have not weighed in for a week, you get one gentle mid-morning reminder. Not daily. Not with an opinion about the number.
A weigh-in prompt is the easiest place in a nutrition app to make somebody feel judged, so the wording stays neutral, it never appears more than once a week, and it is one switch to turn off.
Work out where to start with the free macro calculator or the TDEE calculator, then read overcoming diet plateaus if your trend line goes flat.
Snap a photo of your meal and let CalorTracker's AI log the calories and macros for you.
Start Tracking Free